/usr/bin/../include/c++/v1/string_view:300:42: error: implicit instantiation of undefined template 'std::char_traits<signed char>'
300 | static_assert(is_same<_CharT, typename traits_type::char_type>::value,
| ^
/home/elsid/dev/openmw/components/to_utf8/to_utf8.cpp:55:41: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::basic_string_view<signed char>' requested here
55 | std::basic_string_view<signed char> getTranslationArray(FromType sourceEncoding)
| ^
/usr/bin/../include/c++/v1/__fwd/string.h:23:29: note: template is declared here
23 | struct _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS char_traits;
| ^
std::char_traits support for non char types was removed from libc++19:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D157058.
components\lua\configuration.cpp(133): warning C4267: 'argument': conversion from 'size_t' to 'int', possible loss of data
components\esm3\effectlist.cpp(35): warning C4267: '=': conversion from 'size_t' to 'uint32_t', possible loss of data
components_tests\misc\testmathutil.cpp(54): warning C4305: 'argument': truncation from 'const double' to 'osg::Vec3f::value_type'
components_tests\misc\testmathutil.cpp(62): warning C4305: 'argument': truncation from 'const double' to 'osg::Vec3f::value_type'
components_tests\misc\testmathutil.cpp(131): warning C4305: 'argument': truncation from 'const double' to 'osg::Vec3f::value_type'
components_tests\misc\testmathutil.cpp(135): warning C4305: 'argument': truncation from 'const double' to 'osg::Vec3f::value_type'
components_tests\misc\testmathutil.cpp(135): warning C4305: 'argument': truncation from 'const double' to 'osg::Vec3f::value_type'
components_tests\misc\testmathutil.cpp(139): warning C4305: 'argument': truncation from 'const double' to 'osg::Vec3f::value_type'
Previously, comments would be associated with the openmw.cfg line that followed them, but only up to the first comma.
This meant that if you had fallback=thing,otherthing and fallback=thing,thirdthing, comments above the thirdthing line would be moved above the otherthing line, even though both lines would be kept when the file was written out.
This seemed to be an attempt at a feature when cc9cii first implemented the comment preservation system, but it only seems to cause confusion.
