To fix warnings:
/usr/bin/../lib64/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.3.1/../../../../include/c++/7.3.1/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:588:8: warning: delete called on non-final 'NifOsg::ControllerFunction' that has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
[-Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor]
delete __p;
^
/usr/bin/../lib64/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.3.1/../../../../include/c++/7.3.1/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:595:4: note: in instantiation of function template specialization
'std::__shared_count<__gnu_cxx::_S_atomic>::__shared_count<NifOsg::ControllerFunction *>' requested here
: __shared_count(__p)
^
/usr/bin/../lib64/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.3.1/../../../../include/c++/7.3.1/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:1079:17: note: in instantiation of function template specialization
'std::__shared_count<__gnu_cxx::_S_atomic>::__shared_count<NifOsg::ControllerFunction *>' requested here
: _M_ptr(__p), _M_refcount(__p, typename is_array<_Tp>::type())
^
/usr/bin/../lib64/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.3.1/../../../../include/c++/7.3.1/bits/shared_ptr.h:129:25: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'std::__shared_ptr<NifOsg::ControllerFunction,
__gnu_cxx::_S_atomic>::__shared_ptr<NifOsg::ControllerFunction, void>' requested here
shared_ptr(_Yp* __p) : __shared_ptr<_Tp>(__p) { }
^
/home/elsid/dev/openmw/components/nifosg/nifloader.cpp:242:39: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'std::shared_ptr<NifOsg::ControllerFunction>::shared_ptr<NifOsg::ControllerFunction, void>' requested here
callback->setFunction(std::shared_ptr<NifOsg::ControllerFunction>(new NifOsg::ControllerFunction(key)));
^
/usr/bin/../lib64/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.3.1/../../../../include/c++/7.3.1/bits/unique_ptr.h:78:2: warning: delete called on non-final 'MWGui::ResponseCallback' that has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
[-Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor]
delete __ptr;
^
/usr/bin/../lib64/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.3.1/../../../../include/c++/7.3.1/bits/unique_ptr.h:268:4: note: in instantiation of member function 'std::default_delete<MWGui::ResponseCallback>::operator()' requested here
get_deleter()(__ptr);
^
/home/elsid/dev/openmw/apps/openmw/mwgui/dialogue.cpp:58:23: note: in instantiation of member function 'std::unique_ptr<MWGui::ResponseCallback, std::default_delete<MWGui::ResponseCallback> >::~unique_ptr' requested here
PersuasionDialog::PersuasionDialog(ResponseCallback* callback)
^
Previously, a Container packet with a REQUEST action always made the client respond with the contents of all the containers in that cell.
The previous behavior now only happens for requests that have no WorldObjects attached, while requests that have WorldObjects attached get a reply with the contents of those specific containers.
A main priority in TES3MP development is to avoid making major changes to OpenMW code, so as to avoid merge conflicts in the future. Whenever avoiding potential conflicts seems especially difficult for the proper implementation of a particular multiplayer feature, that multiplayer feature is often put off until later or partially implemented with the intent of being revisited in the future.
Container sync is the perfect example. Previously, the OpenMW code for container actions was kept exactly as it was, with clients unilaterally accepting their own container changes as per singleplayer-specific code, with only the addition that clients sent container packets every time they made a change in a container, packets which were then forwarded unquestioningly by the server to other players. This meant that two players clicking on the same item in a container at the same time both managed to take it, thus duplicating the item.
Immediately after the packets were already forwarded, server scripts were able to check for incorrect changes, such as the removal of more items than should have existed in a container, but they had to send their own packets that attempted to fix what had already been accepted on the initial client and then forwarded to all clients, which was quite onerous in some scenarios, such as when a player on a slow connection immediately dropped items in the world after taking them from a container (which is why the default TES3MP serverside scripts made no attempt at sending corrective packets at all, preferring to expect the matter to be solved in a later C++ implementation).
This commit fixes item duping in containers by preventing container actions from initially running on clients and by ending the automatic forwarding of container packets by the server. Instead, clients now send container packets that act as requests for container actions, and serverside scripts have to forward these requests themselves. In other words, without a matching Container event in the server's Lua scripts, players are completely unable to affect containers for themselves or for others.
To forward a received Container packet, the following line must be used in a Container event in the Lua scripts:
tes3mp.SendContainer(true, true)
When an invalid action count is used in a container request, the serverside scripts can amend it using the following new function:
tes3mp.SetReceivedContainerItemActionCount(objectIndex, itemIndex, actionCount)
Thus, the serverside scripts are able to allow only container actions that are correct based on their own recorded contents for that container.
The OpenMW code allowing unilateral container actions in mwgui/container.cpp is now prevented from executing. When a player's container request is returned to them, code in mwmp/WorldEvent.cpp simulates those container actions instead.
Previously, throwing weapon sync was completely broken for players, as the count for their equipped throwing weapons was never set and – as a result – defaulted to a count of 1 on other clients. As a result, any time a player threw a dart, they would then appear as having switched to hand-to-hand for other players.
Moreover, the count of equipped items was mistakenly based on the total count of items with that refId in the inventory. As a result, if – for example – I equipped 1 Daedric Longsword and had 4 others in my inventory, my DedicatedPlayer on other clients would equip a Daedric Longsword with a count of 5. If I was overencumbered by having that many Daedric Longswords on me and then dropped 4 of them, allowing myself to move again, my DedicatedPlayer would still walk around with 5 Daedric Longswords and lack animations due to still being overencumbered on the other clients.
These problems were less prevalent for actors, but their equipment updating code has also been changed to match that of players.
Certain servers do not want the players to have debug information about the locations and actions of other players, so a client's log level can now be enforced by the server via the GameSettings packet.
This reverts commit 2ac01dc02a.
Commit 2ac01dc02a had confused the ON_RECORD_DYNAMIC event meant for custom items with a hypothetical ON_PLAYER_STATS_DYNAMIC event meant for dynamic player stats and had added functionality appropriate for the latter.
ON_PLAYER_STATS_DYNAMIC was never implemented because it would have caused too much event spam, with it constantly being triggered by any running player losing fatigue. If it ends up being added, the reverted lines from 2ac01dc02a should be added to it instead.
* http to https for supported urls
* http to https
* http to https
* http to https
* http to https
* http to https
* http to https
* http to https
* http tp https
* http to https
* http to https
* http to https
* http to https
* http to https
* http to https
* http to https
* http to https
* some url fixes
* http to https
This allows the distant land to actually be seen when the user enables it. The
values used are replicated from MGE XE's default settings and should probably
be exposed somewhere.
